The following definitions govern the use of these terms throughout this contract. Where a section uses a defined term, the meaning is the one given here.
Abandonment — Unilateral departure from the marriage: physical desertion, or initiating civil divorce proceedings outside the remedy process without legitimate covenantal grounds. It does not include a party invoking Section V or Section VI according to their terms; a party who proceeds through the remedy process is not in violation of the abandonment prohibition, regardless of outcome.
Abandonment also includes constructive abandonment: a pattern of conduct so severe and so persistently unrepentant that it constitutes a de facto rejection of the covenant obligations, even without physical departure. The church panel may find constructive abandonment where a party has committed one or more violations listed in Section IV — particularly assault, ejection, or criminal conduct — and has refused to repent through the full remedy process. This finding does not create a new divorce ground; it is an application of the existing desertion ground (1 Corinthians 7:15) to cases where the offender has abandoned the covenant in conduct while remaining present in body. The threshold is high: isolated violations, however serious, do not establish constructive abandonment. The church panel must find a sustained pattern of unrepentant conduct that makes continued cohabitation dangerous or that demonstrates the offending party's settled refusal to honor the covenant.
Church Panel — The body within the parties' local church that holds authority over excommunication and church discipline under Matthew 18:17. Churches differ on who this is: in congregational polity, the congregation itself acts on matters of membership and discipline; in elder-rule polity, the session or eldership acts. This contract does not specify a polity. Whatever body in the parties' church holds authority to excommunicate is the body that constitutes the church panel for purposes of this contract. Both parties are morally bound by its determinations. On financial matters consented to arbitration, its determinations may be enforceable in civil court; on child custody it has advisory authority only.
Habitual — A pattern of conduct that is repeated, willful, and ongoing rather than isolated. A single instance of a prohibited act is not habitual. Conduct becomes habitual when it persists after private confrontation (Matthew 18:15) or when a pattern is established across multiple incidents. The church panel determines whether a particular pattern of conduct meets this threshold.
Porneia — The Greek term used in Matthew 19:9 as the exception clause permitting divorce. This contract adopts the broader reading: porneia encompasses adultery (sexual intercourse with someone other than one's spouse), fornication, homosexual conduct, and the habitual, unrepentant consumption of pornography. The pornography inclusion rests on Matthew 5:28: deliberate, sustained lust constitutes adultery of the heart. A single instance does not meet the porneia threshold; habitual and unrepentant use continuing after confrontation through Section V does. The church panel determines whether specific conduct constitutes porneia under this definition.
Preponderance of Evidence — The evidentiary standard applied in church panel proceedings under Section V. A claim is established when the evidence makes it more probable than not that the alleged conduct occurred. This is a practical standard, not a biblical one; it is adopted as workable and just. The church panel may raise the standard to clear and convincing evidence in cases where the consequences are severe, such as divorce proceedings.
Reconciliation — Genuine restoration of the marital relationship: repentance by the offending party, forgiveness by the wronged party, and a return to the obligations of the covenant. Reconciliation is not nominal; the church panel must be satisfied that the conditions for it are real, not performed. A verbal statement of reconciliation without demonstrated change in conduct does not satisfy this definition.
Remedy Process — The full sequence of Section V and Section VI: private confrontation, witnesses, church panel adjudication, reconciliation counseling, separation if warranted, and dissolution only on specific scriptural grounds. No remedy in Section VI is available without exhausting the prior steps.
Separation — A temporary, structured suspension of cohabitation ordered or sanctioned by the church panel. The accused party leaves the marital home. Financial and parental obligations continue during separation. Separated parties retain their marital status under this contract until the church panel renders a final determination. Separation is not dissolution; it is a protective measure creating conditions for repentance and potential return.
---
Marriage, as ordained by God, is a sacred covenant that reflects His unchanging character and relational design for humanity. From the beginning, Scripture portrays marriage as a profound union intended to embody mutual love, fidelity, and oneness, as seen in Genesis 2:24: "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." This covenantal bond mirrors God's own covenants with His people, such as the Abrahamic covenant (Genesis 17:1-8), where God promises blessing and requires faithfulness, or the Mosaic covenant (Exodus 19:5-6), which establishes Israel as a holy nation under divine law. Yet, central to these divine covenants is God's unyielding justice—a attribute intrinsic to His nature, as declared in Deuteronomy 32:4: "He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he." This justice ensures that covenants are not arbitrary but governed by righteousness, accountability, and consequences for violation, balancing mercy with holiness (Psalm 89:14: "Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne: mercy and truth shall go before thy face").
God's dealings with Israel in the prophets bear on this project, though the argument must be stated carefully. When Israel persisted in spiritual adultery through idolatry—likened to marital unfaithfulness in Ezekiel 16:15-34— God issued a certificate of divorce, as recorded in Jeremiah 3:8: "And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also." Isaiah 50:1 echoes the same reality. This is typological and analogical reasoning, not direct legislative precedent: the Sinai covenant is not a template for Christian marriage law. What these texts establish is a principle—that covenants, by their nature, can include provisions for justice when covenant terms are violated. The argument does not go further than that. Critically, the prophetic context also determines what kind of justice is in view. God's "divorce" was disciplinary, not terminal; the call to repentance in Jeremiah 3:12-14 follows immediately, and Hosea 2:19-20 promises a new betrothal in righteousness and faithfulness. Restoration was the goal from the beginning. This is the corrective the Jer. 3:8 analogy must carry into any application to human marriage: justice provisions exist to protect the covenant and create conditions for repentance and reconciliation, not primarily to punish. Just as God holds parties accountable without abandoning His redemptive purposes (Romans 3:25-26), so too should a Christian marriage contract order its remedies toward reconciliation first and dissolution only as a last resort.
This marriage contract, therefore, is biblical in its intent to uphold justice within the covenant of marriage, acknowledging human sinfulness (Romans 3:23: "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God") while aspiring to God's ideals. In a fallen world, where no-fault divorce laws can undermine retributive justice—allowing one party to inflict harm (e.g., infidelity) without equitable consequences—this document provides a structured, Scripture-guided approach to benefits, prohibitions, appeals, and remedies. It promotes transparency and mutual submission (Ephesians 5:21: "Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God"), deterring sin through clear expectations and fostering reconciliation where possible (Matthew 19:6: "Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder," balanced with allowances for porneia in verse 9). Importance lies in maintaining justice to reflect God's character: it safeguards vulnerable parties (e.g., in asset division or child custody, per 1 Timothy 5:8), encourages stewardship of resources (Proverbs 13:22), and counters cultural derision of marriage by mitigating risks, particularly for men in high-stakes legal environments like California (where community property and alimony can lead to unjust outcomes). Edge cases, such as illness or poverty (explicitly non-prohibited herein), highlight mercy's role alongside justice (James 2:13: "For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment"). Related considerations include cultural shifts—e.g., second marriages (1 Corinthians 7:39) or blended families—where such contracts can equitably protect inheritances without implying distrust. Ultimately, this contract is a tool for godly living, not a presumption of failure, aligning human unions with divine justice to glorify God (1 Corinthians 10:31).
The remedies in this section are ordered deliberately. Reconciliation is not a preliminary step to discharge before consequences apply — it is the goal. Separation creates conditions for repentance and reflection. Divorce is permitted on specific scriptural grounds, but no party should enter that stage without having genuinely pursued restoration. The structure of this section reflects the structure of Matthew 18:15-17: accountability serves reconciliation; it does not replace it.